• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • About Experts
    • Amanda Foxon-Hill
    • Cindy Jones
    • Colin Sanders
    • Dene Godfrey
    • Doug Schoon
    • Katherine Corkill
    • Paula Begoun
    • Perry Romanowski
    • Robert Tisserand
  • About Us
    • About Kristin
    • About Lisa
    • Mission Statement
  • Contact
    • Submit Article
    • Submit Feedback
  • Press
  • Advertising
  • Resources
    • California Resources
    • Canada Resources
    • EPA Resources
    • European Union Resources
    • FDA Resources
    • Natural and Organic Resources
    • Other Resources
    • US Department of Health Resources
    • We Like
  • Support Us
  • Forum
    • Member Messaging

Personal Care Truth or Scare

cosmetic safety information based on scientific research

  • Ask the Experts
  • Information
  • Ingredients
  • Legislation
  • Personal Care News
  • Regulations
  • Science
You are here: Home / Archives for skin cancer prevention

skin cancer prevention

Spotlight on Sun Protection from In-Cosmetics: part 4: Australia & India

May 1, 2012 By Kristin Fraser Cotte 2 Comments

In the 4th and final post in the Spotlight on Sun Protection series, we’ll take a look at Australia, New Zealand & India and wrap up with some final thoughts on this series and manufacturing sunscreens. If you’ve just discovered the spotlight on sun protection series, you can click the links to take a look at part 1, where we covered sunscreen regulations in the USA, part 2: the EU and part 3: Asia. Australia and India were presented by Alain Khaiat, Ph.D. of Seers Consulting during a very informative half day scientific seminar I attended at In-Cosmetics Barcelona. Australia and India both have rigidly outlined stability data requirements when compared to other regions of the world, most likely due to the fact that both areas of the world can experience extreme heat.

Australia has a maximum SPF rating of 30+. There are 2 different classifications for sunscreens depending on the SPF rating. If the sunscreen has an SPF less than 15, it is considered a cosmetic; if it’s greater than 15, it’s listed as a medicine. The registration lead time is 1 month and requires the complete formulation and manufacture process, which must be conducted in a TGA approved site that has GMP (good manufacturing practice) pre-clearance. While the lead time is only a month, Australia requires a very specific stability testing report be completed first. The report needs to show the product is stable for anywhere from 6 months to a 3-year shelf life, and has rigid requirements as to the temperatures the sunscreen must be exposed to for the shelf life claim. Any accelerated testing the formulator uses for this specific data must also be confirmed by real-time testing. Since all data is required for submission to complete the 1 month registration process, the manufacturer needed to begin collecting the data over 3 years prior in order to obtain a 3 year shelf life rating. The manufacturer does not need to provide a product sample unless it’s requested, but must submit final packaging along with any proprietary ingredients (this usually means the fragrance) which also need to be registered with TGA. A separate SPF certificate is also required.

You may recall that we discussed Hong Kong’s lack of requirements in part 3… Like Honk Kong, New Zealand does not have a registration or notification process for bringing sunscreen to market. There is also no limit on the SPF factor that can be claimed on the label. So if you happen to find an SPF of 70 over there, it does not mean it’s any more powerful than the SPF 30+ you may have picked up in Australia, it’s solely the labeling claims that the country is allowed to print by law.

In India, sunscreen is considered a cosmetic and there is no maximum SPF rating. India has different registration lead times for sunscreens depending on if the product is made locally (3 months), or for import (9 months). India requires the manufacturer to release the full product formulation, including the quantitative formula with declaration and disclosure of functions of ingredients. All label text must be disclosed during the registration process along with the product specs, manufacturing process, chemical and microbiological testing methods and any data supporting product claims. India requires the manufacture to run a minimum of 2 pilot batches before registering a sunscreen. India requires specific stability testing requirements to show shelf life of the sunscreen. Testing may be done using accelerated methods of exposure to extreme heat. However, any data that is accelerated also needs to be confirmed by real time testing, so the process takes longer than the 3 or 9 months since the real time data (for up to a 3 year shelf life) needs to be available to register.

If you’ve followed this 4-part series, you’ll see that while there is no global harmonization in sunscreen or SPF ratings the different areas of the world do have one thing in common… It’s a very expensive, involved and a time consuming process to bring a sunscreen to market! As the owner of a small cosmetic company located in sunny Southern California that manufactures products, we are often asked why we don’t make sunscreen. The answer is simple; small and indie manufacturers simply cannot afford to manufacture their own sunscreen. The only way for a small or indie manufacturer could sell a sunscreen under their brand name is through a private label process where a registered lab has gone through what I’ve outlined in the past 4 posts (depending on the region of the world) and is manufacturing the sunscreen for their brand. You should be able to decipher this by looking at the “manufacturer information” on the product label which is required in most regions of the world. Hopefully this series has enlightened you a bit when it comes to sunscreens… remember, the higher the SPF # rating does not always mean the “better” sunscreen; there are so many factors due to consider the different laws and lack of continuity across the globe.

Filed Under: Information, Regulations, Science Tagged With: Alain Khaiat, cosmetic and ingredient statements, Kristin Fraser Cotte, labeling and packaging regulations, labeling guidelines, skin cancer prevention, SPF, sun damage, Sun Protection Conference, suncreen, sunscreen regulations in Australia, sunscreen safety, the grapeseed company

Spotlight on Sun Protection in Asia from In-Cosmetics: part 3

April 23, 2012 By Kristin Fraser Cotte 1 Comment

In the past few days we’ve looked at sunscreen regulations in the USA and EU; today we will examine Asia. As I mentioned in part 1, there is no continuity in regulating sunscreen around the world. As a continent, Asia’s various countries have different regulations, SPF ratings and registration requirements and guidelines to bring sunscreens to market. This information was presented by Alain Khaiat, Ph.D. of Seers Consulting during a very informative half day scientific seminar I attended at In-Cosmetics Barcelona. Let’s break things down by specific countries, taking a look at maximum SPF, how sunscreens are classified, and the process of  bringing product to market:

1. In China, sunscreens fall under the category of specialty cosmetics. They have capped the maximum allowed SPF rating at 30+. The process to bring a new sunscreen to market takes about a year, which includes testing at a Chinese government recognized lab. China requires a final product formulation, specs, manufacturing process and claim support documents for SPF and clinical testing reports to be on file with the government. They also require a safety assessment on any product that is considered to contain a risky substance as well as 3 dozens of product samples provided for testing. The product must have a Chinese name, and all artwork on the packaging must also be in Chinese.

2. Korea classifies sunscreen as “Functional Cosmetics” and caps the maximum SPF at 50+. Korea requires a product sample for registration, and reports on tests methods for both active ingredients and finished product. This includes the background of origin, development and final formulation. In addition, Korea requires any SPF or efficacy data and testing info to be provided by a test supervisor with more than 5 years experience in a respective field. If the manufacturer is introducing a new sunscreen active ingredient, they must provide additional safety data for any and all new actives. In Korea the manufacturer must also provide all fragrance information, including a components list of the fragrance. The registration process is 6 months.

3. In Taiwan, sunscreens are “Medicated Cosmetics” with a maximum SPF of 50+. The registration lead time is 4 months and requires a “Free Sales Certificate” which needs to be notarized by a cosmetic association. This notarization is not necessary if the certificate was issued by the FDA. The final formulation must include percentages by INCI name. They do not require any product samples for registration, only a photocopy of the primary packaging. All artwork on the packaging must be in Chinese with a Chinese product name.

4. In Japan and ASEAN* (Association of Southeast Asian Nations), there is “notification” rather than a registration process to bring a sunscreen to market. This notification process entails a 2 week lead time where companies must provide specific information on product formulation, including ingredients, name, level and function, along with their stability testing and a special certificate if amy animal derived material* is used in the formula. Japan allows a maximum SPF of 50+.

*ASEAN is similar to Japan, but there is not a special certificate required for animal derived materials, and they do not have a maximum allowed SPF rating.

Hong Kong has no regulations for bringing sunscreen to market or limits on maximum SPF ratings.

In the fourth and final post in this series, we’ll be wrapping up and shining the spotlight on Sun Protection in Australia and India.

References

Scientific seminar presentation at In-Cosmetics Barcelona by Alain Khaiat, Ph.D.,  Seers Consulting

 

Filed Under: Information, Regulations Tagged With: Alain Khaiat, cosmetic and ingredient statements, cosmetics in Japan, incosmetics, Kristin Fraser Cotte, labeling and packaging regulations, labeling guidelines, skin cancer prevention, SPF, sun damage, Sun Protection Conference, suncreen, sunscreen regulations in Asia, sunscreen safety

Primary Sidebar

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter

Sign Up For Updates Via Your Inbox

Support Personal Care Truth

Recent Comments

  • Dene Godfrey on A Closer Look at Sodium Hydroxide
  • Gilles Bkk on A Closer Look at Sodium Hydroxide
  • bold on Activated Charcoal – Particle Sizes
  • michael on The Impermeable Facts of Skin Penetration and Absorption

Archives

Copyright © 2019 Personal Care Truth • Design By Eco-Office Gals

Disclaimer • Privacy Policy • Legal and Terms of Use