Cosmetic Ingredient Review Panel

The Cosmetic Ingredient Review Expert Panel (CIR) is the very best resource for information on the safety of cosmetic ingredients. Who is on the CIR panel can be seen here.

The mission statement of the CIR is: “The Cosmetic Ingredient Review thoroughly reviews and assesses the safety of ingredients used in cosmetics in an open, unbiased, and expert manner, and publishes the results in the peer-reviewed scientific literature.” The Cosmetic Ingredient Review was established in 1976 by the industry trade association, now known as the Personal Care Products Council with the full support of the FDA and the Consumer Federation of America (CFA). Many have been critical of the FDA but the CFA by definition looks out for the safety of consumers.

The CIR panel is the most qualified organization to make determinations on the safety of cosmetic ingredients. The CIR makes scientific findings that are based on fact and not an agenda.  According to the CIR website these are the CIR procedures are:

  • “CIR staff members conduct extensive literature searches, compile data, and prepare draft reports on high-priority ingredients. They organize the literature into several categories: chemistry (including physical properties and manufacture), use (cosmetic and non-cosmetic), general biology (with absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion data), and animal toxicology (acute, short-term, subchronic, and chronic studies, as well as dermal irritation and sensitization data).
  • The staff also prepare a clinical assessment of the ingredients that may include epidemiologic studies, along with classic repeated insult patch tests. In vitro test data are also gathered and incorporated into the review.
  • At each stage of the process, CIR seeks the input of all interested parties during a formal 60-day comment period.
  • If the open scientific literature contains insufficient information, the Expert Panel will call on industry or other interested parties to provide unpublished data or to undertake specific studies. After multiple opportunities for public comment and open, public discussion, a final safety assessment is issued.
  • The Panel may make one of four basic decisions regarding an ingredient:
    • Safe ingredients — Ingredients safe in the practices of use (product categories) and concentrations of use for each product category as documented in the safety assessment.
    • Unsafe ingredients — These are ingredients with specific adverse effects that make them unsuitable for use in cosmetics.
    • Safe ingredients, with qualifications — The Panel may reach the conclusion that an ingredient can be used safely, but only under certain conditions. Qualifications frequently relate to maximum concentration, but may also address rinse-off versus leave-on uses and other restrictions.
    • Ingredients for which the data are insufficient — If the Panel reaches an “insufficient data” conclusion, it does not state whether the ingredient is safe or unsafe. The Panel is, however, describing a situation in which the available data do not support safety. The specific data that would allow the Panel to complete its assessment always are identified.”

Here are some quick guides that will help use the CIR website to determine what cosmetics ingredients have been found safe.

Quick Reference Table includes a complete list of all findings

Cosmetic Ingredients found safe as used

Cosmetic Ingredients found safe with qualifications

Ingredients found unsafe for use in cosmetics

Be Sociable, Share!

More about the author:  Kayla Fioravanti is the Vice President, Chief Formulator, ARC Registered & Certified Aromatherapist for Essential Wholesale and its lab division Essential Labs. Read more from this author


Related posts:

  1. The Cosmetic Ingredient Review and Safe Cosmetics
  2. Safe Cosmetics Act 2011: Sec. 615 Cosmetic and Ingredient Safety Information
  3. Voluntary Cosmetic Registration Program (VCRP) and Safe Cosmetics
  • Pingback: Tweets that mention Cosmetic Ingredient Review Panel | Personal Care Truth or Scare -- Topsy.com

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_RM6FYXYOF2F6DPIXTOEKXA3724 Bruce

    Kayla
    I agree the CIR is a great source of information on the products they have reviewed. However, how do you decide when their findings are conflicted by other scientific bodies? Look to preservatives. Japan's scientific experts decided to ban formaldehyde releasing ingredients last century. Imidazolidinly urea, which nobody denies is a formaldehyde releaser, is safe as used, according to the CIR, and Sodium Methylglycinate (another formaldehyde releaser) has not even been tested by the CIR. Both of these materials are banned in Japan. This is just one place where the scientific communities disagree. The CIR board and the SCCNP (the EU's equivalent to the CIR) disagree on many issues as well, the allowable uses of colors in cosmetics is just one place.
    My personal feeling is that the FDA , and the CIR are behind in the battle to make sure our products are as safe as they can be. I do believe they mean well, but are not funded enough to be the only authority on this subject, a feeling I have about the EWG as well.
    Back to the original question, how do you deal with the contradictions in scientific opinions of these “experts”?

    Thanks
    Bruce

    • Dene Godfrey

      I am a little late on this one, as I missed it!

      @Bruce – sorry but your information is not accurate. Imidazolinyl urea IS permitted in Japan, but with restrictions and labelling requirements. Sodium hydroxymethylglycinate is not permitted mainly because no manufacturer has gone through the tortuous approval process (a decision taken by several manufacturers after the extremely lengthy process endured during the attempts to get imidurea and DMDMH approved), NOT because of any specific safety issues. DMDM Hydantoin is similarly permitted, and diazolidinyl urea has never been submitted.

  • http://starfishpod.com/ Henry

    Bruce, anything is dangerous if used at the wrong concentration. Even water can kill you if too much is put into your body at once. People need to stop fearing ingredient names and understand the importance of dosage levels.

    -Developer of 95% natural cosmetics at http://starfishpod.com/